We couldn’t have said it better.

Comments by reader Scott in CA

I work here in San Francisco, although I no longer live here. I made my escape in 1999 and moved to the burbs.

I lived in San Francisco for 30 years before I left. When I came here, this was a wonderful, vibrant city that was affordable, safe, clean, and quirky enough to be fun without being nuts.

My, how times have changed. For the last 10-15 years, I have watched this city degenerate into a third world hellhole.

Hundreds of people live on the street, sleeping in the doorways of businesses and homes. The parks, including Golden Gate Park, are filthy and unusable, due to being infested with psychotic vagrants and the petty criminal class of transients that drift in and out. We spend almost $200 million yearly on “the homeless”.

The schools are disastrous. Gang infested, violent, understaffed, undersupplied, and governed by a school board obsessed with political correctness. The election last week brought two more “women of color” who said the first thing they are going to do is factor in race for school assignements; something clearly forbidden by Prop 209 which banned this. SF’s white, middle class families have left in droves as they watched the schools decline. The number of white children in public school here is 9%, even as whites are still close to half of the city’s population. They fled for the burbs like I did, where they have created beautiful, well-run communities financed by the wealth brought out of San Francisco.

The city “government” is dominated by agenda-driven leftists who regard business as evil, corrupt, and good for nothing except paying taxes for social programs for “the poor” and “immigrants”.

The military was long ago driven from this area, which historically had a long military tradition going back to the Spanish in 1775, and Mare Island shipyard, which dated from 1851.

The city’s only growing areas are in high-end retail around Union Square, and in the huge new developments of condos and apartments near the Giants Ball Park. Needless to say, the residents there do not share the lefty views of the rabble.

The city is no longer the center of the Bay Area, although it’s leaders insist it still is. Those of us who live around the Bay have no reason to come here anymore, as all the affluent suburbs have fine restaurants and cultural activities that used to be available only in the city.

San Francisco is becoming, simply, irrelevant.

If you want to see the results of ten years of hard left government on a city, come take a look.

UPDATE:

Another fact: Oakland has a military charter school. The teachers are retired military people. The student body is over 90% non-white.

Now why, pray tell, would all these parents want to send their kids to a military school in liberal Oakland? Could it be that they want discipline and order for their kids to excel?

Stop Bush, in his rant above, refuses to see how SF has declined. Sure, there are pretty neighborhoods for people with money. But huge areas of the city are filthy, dangerous, crime-ridden, filled with drug dealers, vagrants, psychotics and those who prey on them. Years of coddling “the homeless” has produced this.

Sure, “Care Not Cash” has housed over 2000 people in 2 years. That is good news. But is has nothing to deal with the thousands more who come here every year to prey on the residents, live on the streets, pass out in front of stores, and terrorize families and children. It’s a disgrace.

The city has over 20,000 vacant apartment. Landlords won’t rent them because of the insane rent control that makes it illegal to live in your own building if you have a “protected” tenant. Rent increases average about 1% a year, regardless of the financial situation of the tenant or landlord. The city is 65% renters who happily vote YES on every bond, knowing that the landlords can’t pass on the costs to the tenants.

So, Stop Bush, don’t lecture me about how great SF is. It used to be, but no longer. Tens of thousands of us have fled the crime and disorder for suburban cities where we can live in peace.

And no, we don’t want you there.

RELATED:
San Francisco School Board Votes
to Dump JROTC Program
S.F.: A City of Liberals Without Children
San Francisco: What Family Values?
Boycott San Francisco
S.F. Leather Pride: Nothin’ A Whip
and Studded-Collar Can’t Fix
Bay Area Celebrates “Liberal Bliss”
March of the Moonbats: San Francisco

1. [...] Who Is Against The ROTC? (Vote) » The Extremist System » San Francisco: Past and Present — A Reader’sRetrospective » Why the U.S. Cannot Timetable Iraq » San Francisco School Board Votes to Dump JROTC Program » ACLU Seeks Again to Block Wiretaps » Why Do Terrorists Prefer Democrats? » Gen. Pace’s Alternative to the Iraq Study Group » Unlike Democrats, Romania Will Not Abandon Iraq » Dems Suggest Bush Lead the Way on Iraq » Al-Qaida in Iraq Claims It’s Winning War » Moving Forward, Part II » Public Education At Work: California Student Ban Pledge of Allegiance » Schwarzenegger Happy That Democrats Take Control of Congress » Moving Forward, Part I » Dear Nancy, It’s Your War Now: Watcha’ Gonna Do? » Pelosi Says Iraq Is Not “A War To Win” » Schumer Shamelessly Preaches to Allen » Rumsfeld Resigns: What Strategery? » All Hail, Pelosi! List all posts » [...]

   Pingback by California Conservative » Who Is Against The ROTC? (Vote) — November 16, 2006 @ 5:20 pm

1. Thanks for bumping me up. I’ll try to have more for you as often as possible. Working for San Francisco government, the possibilites are endless.

   Comment by Scott in CA — November 15, 2006 @ 7:46 pm

2. I have visited Northern California off and on over 25 years and have always stayed in SF a few days. SF is in decline, that’s for sure. It shows you how far into the muck multiculturalism can push you. There are NO corporations considering moving to SF. The reasons are obvious. My last friend moved out of SF 10 years ago and rarely goes back. It is a geographically beautiful city, I love it. But to live there, no way. And all those pretentious liberals ‘we are in control and know what’s good you ya!’ Thanks liberals, anarchists, communists, losers and halfbrains. Did I miss anyone?

   Comment by John Sobieski — November 15, 2006 @ 7:55 pm

3. True story:

   3 years ago I was just finishing up a job interview in downtown San Francisco and I had stopped and got some Starbucks coffee after said interview. I placed my leather presentation folder and coffee on top of a large covered public garbage can so I could grab my cell phone and make a call.

   Right when I had done that a homeless guy comes up to the garbage and stated, “Beats going in the streets man!” He proceeded to whip out his happy-fun-stick in broad day light and urinated directly into the garbage can.

   I worked on 1st street for a time as a sales force recruiter and every morning I had to walk by an alley where homeless people used to defecate. During the summer heat the smell would travel throughout the whole block.

   I have approached many of SF’s homeless population and find that almost 80% are transients coming from other locations in or out of state. I am a “recovering” alcoholic/addict so whenever I see a homeless person in a drunken/drugged stupor, I approach them and try to tell them that there is a way out of that existence.

   Comment by Nat McLaughlin — November 16, 2006 @ 1:02 am

4. I have lived in the Bay Area for most of my life and am now living in San Francisco and going to law school there… Scott had some good points but he got some things wrong.

   “For the last 10-15 years, I have watched this city degenerate into a third world hellhole. Hundreds of people live on the street, sleeping in the doorways of businesses and homes. The parks, including Golden Gate Park, are filthy and unusable, due to being infested with psychotic vagrants and the petty criminal class of transients that drift in and out. We spend almost $200 million yearly on “the homeless”.”

   Homelessness actually became a huge problem 25 years ago, not the last 10-15 years. Yes, the city had really stupid cash/handout/welfare policies for a long time that made things worse. But Mayor Newsom instituted a new “Care not Cash” program 2 1/2 years ago and it has been a major success, decreasing the homeless population by over 2,200 people in that short time period. My school is in the tenderloin, one of the worst parts of the city for homelessness… and the improvement has been noticeable over the last two years.

   “The schools are disastrous. Gang infested, violent, understaffed, undersupplied, and governed by a school board obsessed with political correctness.”

   If I were a conservative I wouldn’t be criticizing the schools so much since SF has been using one your favorite policies for the last four years: vouchers. The schools aren’t that bad. The gangs are only in hunters point, a small area on the far southeast side that is being gentrified as we speak.

   “The city “government” is dominated by agenda-driven leftists who regard business as evil, corrupt, and good for nothing except paying taxes for social programs for “the poor” and “immigrants”.”

   Regrettably this has been a big problem with SF. The leftists have a 7-4 majority on the board of supervisors and constantly oppose lots of the pro-business, pro-development policeis of mayor newsom. They also do stupid stuff all the time, like preventing the USS Iowa battleship from becoming a historical museum at an SF Pier in order to protest the Iraq war (after Dianne Feinstein spent a long time lobbying to get the Iowa to the Port of SF).

   But the leftists are losing power. Supervisor Daly almost lost his seat in a closely contested election for his SOMA District. As areas like SOMA gentrify more with hard working, capitalistic young people, the leftists’ grip on power will loosen.

   “The city’s only growing areas are in high-end retail around Union Square, and in the huge new developments of condos and apartments near the Giants Ball Park. Needless to say, the residents there do not share the lefty views of the rabble.”

   Fortunately this is not true. The leftists try hard to stop development but it is still happening in lots of areas. Most areas of the city are already super gentrified like Potrero Hill, Marina, Seaside, Sunset, Richmond, Noe Valley, Nob Hill, and Russian Hill. The few bad areas have been gentrifying a lot and are getting smaller and smaller - like the tenderloin and SOMA.

   “The city is no longer the center of the Bay Area, although it’s leaders insist it still is. Those of us who live around the Bay have no reason to come here anymore, as all the affluent suburbs have fine restaurants and cultural activities that used to be available only in the city.”

   This is almost true. SF is still definitely the cultural center of the bay area - in terms of Art, Concerts, Sports, and civic events like Fleet Week. It is also still the financial center… even though silicon valley and san jose have higher per capita income, all the major invest banking companies and big law firms are still based out of downtown SF, not San Jose.

   “San Francisco is becoming, simply, irrelevant.”

   You can’t really say that when SF’s congressional representative is now the Speaker of the House…

   Comment by Michael — November 17, 2006 @ 2:29 pm