<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thank You, Tom Bevan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: T. A. Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/comment-page-1/#comment-752239</link>
		<dc:creator>T. A. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/#comment-752239</guid>
		<description>Im sure the ACLU or MAMBLA or some other  group of perverts will fly to his defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im sure the ACLU or MAMBLA or some other  group of perverts will fly to his defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/comment-page-1/#comment-751554</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 08:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/#comment-751554</guid>
		<description>Benn, Benn, Benn.  Just exactly what does this have to do with the topic at hand?  Nothing, you say?  Just an interesting little piece of dirt to remind everyone Republicans are nothing but scumbags, like other of your comments have been?

With a little help and a good dose of Kool-Aid you may make the big-time someday and get to play with the heavyweights.

In the meantime, I'll ask once again, can you please concentrate for more than three milliseconds and stay on topic?  I'm just real sure that if we gathered up all the freaks, San Fran sickos would outweigh all the Republican dirt you can try to make us feel guilty about.

(That's one of the nice things about being a conservative - we really do believe each person is responsible for his or her own actions.  What this Mr. Nielsen did is his responsibility, not ours, and it is liberal policies, all the way from the classroom to the courtroom, that allow such depravity to exist and flourish.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benn, Benn, Benn.  Just exactly what does this have to do with the topic at hand?  Nothing, you say?  Just an interesting little piece of dirt to remind everyone Republicans are nothing but scumbags, like other of your comments have been?</p>
<p>With a little help and a good dose of Kool-Aid you may make the big-time someday and get to play with the heavyweights.</p>
<p>In the meantime, I&#8217;ll ask once again, can you please concentrate for more than three milliseconds and stay on topic?  I&#8217;m just real sure that if we gathered up all the freaks, San Fran sickos would outweigh all the Republican dirt you can try to make us feel guilty about.</p>
<p>(That&#8217;s one of the nice things about being a conservative - we really do believe each person is responsible for his or her own actions.  What this Mr. Nielsen did is his responsibility, not ours, and it is liberal policies, all the way from the classroom to the courtroom, that allow such depravity to exist and flourish.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benn</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/comment-page-1/#comment-750520</link>
		<dc:creator>Benn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 21:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/#comment-750520</guid>
		<description>O.C. attorney pleads guilty to molesting teens
The former aide to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher says he met one boy on the Internet and lived with the family of the other.
By David Haldane
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

December 6, 2007

A Ladera Ranch attorney and former congressional aide pleaded guilty Wednesday to molesting two teenage boys. In exchange for the plea, authorities said, Jeffrey Ray Nielsen, 37, is expected to be sentenced April 18 to three years in state prison.

"It was time to settle these cases," Nielsen's attorney, Paul Meyer, said.

Nielsen, a former aide to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Huntington Beach) who has also worked for Orange County GOP Chairman Scott Baugh, was arrested in 2003. Westminster police had found thousands of images of child pornography on his home computer, laptop and a computer at his Costa Mesa law office.

Prosecutors contended that Nielsen had met the 14-year-old victim on a gay Internet site and driven the boy to his Ladera Ranch condominium, where the two engaged in oral sex.

They did the same thing on two additional occasions over the next four weeks, prosecutors said. The boy, a high school freshman, told a friend who alerted school authorities.

A jury was unable to reach a verdict in the case earlier this year.

Later, however, Nielsen confessed, and the Orange County district attorney's office obtained additional evidence from two of his former roommates. Prosecutors also filed charges involving a 13-year-old they said Nielsen had molested repeatedly while living at the boy's family's Virginia home in 1994.

Nielsen will remain free on $10,000 bail until his sentencing, authorities said.

Nielsen's father, Ben, is a former Fountain Valley mayor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.C. attorney pleads guilty to molesting teens<br />
The former aide to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher says he met one boy on the Internet and lived with the family of the other.<br />
By David Haldane<br />
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer</p>
<p>December 6, 2007</p>
<p>A Ladera Ranch attorney and former congressional aide pleaded guilty Wednesday to molesting two teenage boys. In exchange for the plea, authorities said, Jeffrey Ray Nielsen, 37, is expected to be sentenced April 18 to three years in state prison.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was time to settle these cases,&#8221; Nielsen&#8217;s attorney, Paul Meyer, said.</p>
<p>Nielsen, a former aide to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Huntington Beach) who has also worked for Orange County GOP Chairman Scott Baugh, was arrested in 2003. Westminster police had found thousands of images of child pornography on his home computer, laptop and a computer at his Costa Mesa law office.</p>
<p>Prosecutors contended that Nielsen had met the 14-year-old victim on a gay Internet site and driven the boy to his Ladera Ranch condominium, where the two engaged in oral sex.</p>
<p>They did the same thing on two additional occasions over the next four weeks, prosecutors said. The boy, a high school freshman, told a friend who alerted school authorities.</p>
<p>A jury was unable to reach a verdict in the case earlier this year.</p>
<p>Later, however, Nielsen confessed, and the Orange County district attorney&#8217;s office obtained additional evidence from two of his former roommates. Prosecutors also filed charges involving a 13-year-old they said Nielsen had molested repeatedly while living at the boy&#8217;s family&#8217;s Virginia home in 1994.</p>
<p>Nielsen will remain free on $10,000 bail until his sentencing, authorities said.</p>
<p>Nielsen&#8217;s father, Ben, is a former Fountain Valley mayor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. A. Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/comment-page-1/#comment-748348</link>
		<dc:creator>T. A. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/#comment-748348</guid>
		<description>Thats right in thj broad sense.  
However, Bevan is casing this narrowly in light of Hewitts endorsement of Romneys speech.

If he doesnt like Romney, let him say so.

If its between Romney and any of the secular progressive jackass's, guess who gets my vote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats right in thj broad sense.<br />
However, Bevan is casing this narrowly in light of Hewitts endorsement of Romneys speech.</p>
<p>If he doesnt like Romney, let him say so.</p>
<p>If its between Romney and any of the secular progressive jackass&#8217;s, guess who gets my vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/comment-page-1/#comment-748168</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/#comment-748168</guid>
		<description>If there is a choice between Mitt, Rudy, Mikey and a conservative I'll vote for the conservative.  If it comes down to Mitt and either Rudy or Mikey, I'll probably go with Rudy.  If it's between Mitt and Mikey, I'll go with Mitt because the only way to associate Mikey as anything but socialist is with the (R) behind his name, which is totally meaningless.

What I object to most strenuously, though, is the Romney campaign's automatic reaction to rejection of Mitt as prima facia evidence of bigotry.  Kinda like Hillarious' automatic reaction to her dislikers as being at various time bigots, stupid, a vast conspiracy or just plain nasty.

Some people just don't realize there are others that have significantly different thought patterns and decision-making processes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is a choice between Mitt, Rudy, Mikey and a conservative I&#8217;ll vote for the conservative.  If it comes down to Mitt and either Rudy or Mikey, I&#8217;ll probably go with Rudy.  If it&#8217;s between Mitt and Mikey, I&#8217;ll go with Mitt because the only way to associate Mikey as anything but socialist is with the (R) behind his name, which is totally meaningless.</p>
<p>What I object to most strenuously, though, is the Romney campaign&#8217;s automatic reaction to rejection of Mitt as prima facia evidence of bigotry.  Kinda like Hillarious&#8217; automatic reaction to her dislikers as being at various time bigots, stupid, a vast conspiracy or just plain nasty.</p>
<p>Some people just don&#8217;t realize there are others that have significantly different thought patterns and decision-making processes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. A. Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/comment-page-1/#comment-747732</link>
		<dc:creator>T. A. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/blogging/thank-you-tom-bevan/#comment-747732</guid>
		<description>With all due respect, Bevan seems more obsessed with Hewitt than he is interested in Romneys speech, or why it was even made.

Conservatives defend the principle that anybody, no mmatter what his political views, or previous record of public accomplishments, may run for political office without fear of their religion being use against them.  That there is no test of religion, and that we are all Americans first.

I assume Bevan has no problem with Romney being Mormon. If he has a problem with him as a conservative he knows what to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect, Bevan seems more obsessed with Hewitt than he is interested in Romneys speech, or why it was even made.</p>
<p>Conservatives defend the principle that anybody, no mmatter what his political views, or previous record of public accomplishments, may run for political office without fear of their religion being use against them.  That there is no test of religion, and that we are all Americans first.</p>
<p>I assume Bevan has no problem with Romney being Mormon. If he has a problem with him as a conservative he knows what to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

