Comments on: Hillary’s Hostility http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/hillarys-hostility/ Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM) Wed, 16 May 2012 22:59:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: T. A. Gray http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/hillarys-hostility/comment-page-1/#comment-694940 T. A. Gray Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:13:03 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/hillarys-hostility/#comment-694940 Rocky, Gary is beating around the bush. Hillary is a bit of a bitch. She's abrasive and polarizing. That's baggage she left the White House with, and baggage she's gong to bring back in. Much as I dislike Bill's politics, the guy is an astute shmoozer. Thats meant as a compliment. He can read the public, and he knows enough to go their way when he needs to, and how do do it in a way that doesn't compromise his end goals. Does the name Reagan ring a bell here? He could tell you to go to hell and make it seem like a nice trip. Bill the same ability in a different way. Hillary could tell me the same thing and Id go just get away from her! Hillary sure as hell isn't Reagan, and she's not even another Bill. She couldn't sell the last financial disaster she tried with health care and she'd have another hard time with his one that would burn up whatever good will she might have from the git go. Rocky, Gary is beating around the bush.

Hillary is a bit of a bitch. She’s abrasive and polarizing. That’s baggage she left the White House with, and baggage she’s gong to bring back in.

Much as I dislike Bill’s politics, the guy is an astute shmoozer. Thats meant as a compliment. He can read the public, and he knows enough to go their way when he needs to, and how do do it in a way that doesn’t compromise his end goals. Does the name Reagan ring a bell here? He could tell you to go to hell and make it seem like a nice trip. Bill the same ability in a different way. Hillary could tell me the same thing and Id go just get away from her!

Hillary sure as hell isn’t Reagan, and she’s not even another Bill.

She couldn’t sell the last financial disaster she tried with health care and she’d have another hard time with his one that would burn up whatever good will she might have from the git go.

]]> By: Rocky http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/hillarys-hostility/comment-page-1/#comment-694224 Rocky Tue, 13 Nov 2007 06:20:13 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/hillarys-hostility/#comment-694224 As opposed to, say, a nutjob who can't be bothered to tell us much of anything about his positions, as current CalCon boy-toy Frederick of Hollywood? Or, would it be Rudy, what's your position on _________ (fill in the blank) is, "9/11, on that fateful day, blah, blah, blah..."? Or, perhaps it's Mittens who is spending tens of millions of his <em>own</em> money trying to explain away his bizarre religious beliefs? And you're flummoxed by nuance. Not that it would matter; I doubt anyone who spends so much time trying to debunk all things liberal and progressive would vote for Hillary, anyway. The interesting topic here is that the Clintons are being called out, once again, on defending themselves against the republican slime machine. Speaking too broadly, and the machine slimes her as "speak[ing] out of both sides of her mouth"; seek too specific of information, and she's met with "Only surgically precise questioning yields relevant answers." Wow. What a surprise. Which is it? Is Hillary too general, or too vague? Here's a reason to vote for Hillary: she can manipulate the story successfully, and repeatedly. You've certainly proved that point, or is it just coincidence that 3 out of today's 6 posts were about Hillary? As opposed to, say, a nutjob who can’t be bothered to tell us much of anything about his positions, as current CalCon boy-toy Frederick of Hollywood? Or, would it be Rudy, what’s your position on _________ (fill in the blank) is, “9/11, on that fateful day, blah, blah, blah…”? Or, perhaps it’s Mittens who is spending tens of millions of his own money trying to explain away his bizarre religious beliefs?

And you’re flummoxed by nuance.

Not that it would matter; I doubt anyone who spends so much time trying to debunk all things liberal and progressive would vote for Hillary, anyway.

The interesting topic here is that the Clintons are being called out, once again, on defending themselves against the republican slime machine. Speaking too broadly, and the machine slimes her as “speak[ing] out of both sides of her mouth”; seek too specific of information, and she’s met with “Only surgically precise questioning yields relevant answers.” Wow. What a surprise. Which is it? Is Hillary too general, or too vague?

Here’s a reason to vote for Hillary: she can manipulate the story successfully, and repeatedly. You’ve certainly proved that point, or is it just coincidence that 3 out of today’s 6 posts were about Hillary?

]]>