<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Open Letter To Ed Markey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/an-open-letter-to-ed-markey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/an-open-letter-to-ed-markey/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/an-open-letter-to-ed-markey/comment-page-1/#comment-1353271</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/an-open-letter-to-ed-markey/#comment-1353271</guid>
		<description>Man, I'd sure like to know what school of economics these donkey Einsteins went to, just so I could recommend to people they avoid sending their kids anywhere near them.

You'd think that, with all the money the donk leaders are worth, they'd have a better grasp of basic econ 101.

Or maybe they do!  They just don't want schmucks like me to figure out how to make and save a buck, 'cause that would make me less dependent upon them, our saviors.

Obviously, as groups the "African-Americans" and hispanics haven't, 'cause everyones giving them at least 75% of the groups' votes this fall (not counting the criminal alien motor-voter votes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I&#8217;d sure like to know what school of economics these donkey Einsteins went to, just so I could recommend to people they avoid sending their kids anywhere near them.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d think that, with all the money the donk leaders are worth, they&#8217;d have a better grasp of basic econ 101.</p>
<p>Or maybe they do!  They just don&#8217;t want schmucks like me to figure out how to make and save a buck, &#8217;cause that would make me less dependent upon them, our saviors.</p>
<p>Obviously, as groups the &#8220;African-Americans&#8221; and hispanics haven&#8217;t, &#8217;cause everyones giving them at least 75% of the groups&#8217; votes this fall (not counting the criminal alien motor-voter votes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/an-open-letter-to-ed-markey/comment-page-1/#comment-1351833</link>
		<dc:creator>P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/an-open-letter-to-ed-markey/#comment-1351833</guid>
		<description>These guys are lying to us about time:

Via Powerline:

&lt;a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/08/021193.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;How Soon Could We Pump Oil?&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Today the &lt;a href="http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2008/08/07/offshore-oil-production-estimate-illustrates-flaws-in-eia-forecasting/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Institute for Energy Research&lt;/a&gt; followed up with more information about misuse of that report. I want to focus on this point:&lt;blockquote&gt;EIA's analysis assumes that leasing would begin no sooner than 2012, and production would not be expected to start before 2017. Yet, off the coast of California, some of these resources have already been leased. A report from Wall Street research house Sanford C. Bernstein says that California actually could start producing new oil within one year if the moratoria were lifted. The California oil is under shallow water and already has been explored. Drilling platforms have been in place since before the moratorium.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys are lying to us about time:</p>
<p>Via Powerline:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/08/021193.php" rel="nofollow">How Soon Could We Pump Oil?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Today the <a href="http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2008/08/07/offshore-oil-production-estimate-illustrates-flaws-in-eia-forecasting/" rel="nofollow">Institute for Energy Research</a> followed up with more information about misuse of that report. I want to focus on this point:<br />
<blockquote>EIA&#8217;s analysis assumes that leasing would begin no sooner than 2012, and production would not be expected to start before 2017. Yet, off the coast of California, some of these resources have already been leased. A report from Wall Street research house Sanford C. Bernstein says that California actually could start producing new oil within one year if the moratoria were lifted. The California oil is under shallow water and already has been explored. Drilling platforms have been in place since before the moratorium.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

