<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A woman in the White House? Yes, but only the right woman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/a-woman-in-the-white-house-yes-but-only-the-right-woman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/a-woman-in-the-white-house-yes-but-only-the-right-woman/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cousin Isa in WA state</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/a-woman-in-the-white-house-yes-but-only-the-right-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-824570</link>
		<dc:creator>Cousin Isa in WA state</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/2008/a-woman-in-the-white-house-yes-but-only-the-right-woman/#comment-824570</guid>
		<description>This is a good piece, Peter, and I agree with you about Hillary! I also see beneath surfaces, &#38; the altruist who exists under the facade. I just don't know how practical her ideas are - visionaries (myself for one)often see potentials more clearly than realities) &#38; I certainly don't trust her alliances! I see too a yearning to return to a matriarchal society - notice the recent emphasis on Mother Nature, Goddess energy, the Virgin Mary? Even the interest in all things Retro suggests a longing to return to (seemingly) happier times. But the crux of it, I feel, is that men make war, women make babies, &#38; that suggests nurturing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good piece, Peter, and I agree with you about Hillary! I also see beneath surfaces, &amp; the altruist who exists under the facade. I just don&#8217;t know how practical her ideas are - visionaries (myself for one)often see potentials more clearly than realities) &amp; I certainly don&#8217;t trust her alliances! I see too a yearning to return to a matriarchal society - notice the recent emphasis on Mother Nature, Goddess energy, the Virgin Mary? Even the interest in all things Retro suggests a longing to return to (seemingly) happier times. But the crux of it, I feel, is that men make war, women make babies, &amp; that suggests nurturing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

